Stack to Stake™

Insights on turning technical work into clear business communication

Spill App: How to Build a Data Leak in 30 Days

July 31, 2025

Note: Company and app names in this case study have been changed. This analysis is based on a composite of real data breach incidents to illustrate common security and legal risks in app development.

The Spill App Disaster: A Masterclass in How Not to Build… Anything.

Alright, let’s talk about the spill app. Because if you want a perfect, real-world example of how to set a pile of money, user trust, and good intentions on fire, this is it.

You know, it’s been 30 years since we all started hanging out in internet chat rooms. Thirty years since we first learned the cardinal rule: don’t upload your driver’s license to some random corner of the internet.

And yet, here we are. It’s 2025, and thousands of people willingly handed over their government IDs and selfies to an app called “spill.” It was pitched as a “Yelp for dating,” a way to anonymously check if your date was a walking red flag. The only problem? Their idea of “anonymous” involved a DMV-style photoshoot.

If that doesn’t make the little alarm bells in your head start screaming, I don’t know what will.

This wasn’t just a simple data breach. It was a complete, top-to-bottom failure—of architecture, of ethics, of common sense. It’s a train wreck we all need to study, because every decision they appeared to make is a lesson in what not to do.

Let’s break it down.

First, The Idea Itself Was a Liability.

spill wasn’t just a questionable idea; it felt like a vibecoded one. You know what I mean—it’s like someone described a vague concept to an AI, let it spit out some code and a UI, and then just shipped it without a single adult in the room asking, “Hey, should we really be doing this?”

This wasn’t “move fast and break things.” This was “let a robot guess and hope for the best.”

On the surface, “Yelp for dating” sounds intriguing. But think about the ingredients they threw into this cocktail:

You don’t need to be a lawyer to see that you’ve just built a liability machine. It was practically engineered to generate defamation lawsuits.

If they had run this past one human with a basic understanding of risk, the red flags would have been blinding. Instead, it feels like they vibed their way through the whole process, and the result was a privacy time bomb.

What the heck is “Vibecoding”?

Think of it as building a product based on a “vibe” instead of a plan. It’s when you let AI systems handle the heavy lifting—code, UX, architecture—from vague prompts, with little human oversight. You get something that looks right, but it’s often brittle, directionless, and, when you’re dealing with people’s private data, incredibly dangerous.

Then Came the Technical Mess: A Masterclass in What Not to Do.

So, the concept was flawed. But how was the execution? Somehow, even worse.

1. They Appeared to Hoard Data They Promised to Delete.

spill’s privacy policy suggested that ID photos were only used for verification and then deleted. Based on the breach patterns, this appeared to be inaccurate. The evidence suggests they kept everything, indefinitely. No auto-deletion, no secure disposal—nothing.

When questioned, typical excuses in similar cases include “legacy storage systems.” Translation? “We never thought about how to delete things, and now it’s too hard.” Whether that’s incompetence or oversight, it’s a critical failure when you’re handling people’s PII.

2. They Seemed to Be Hoping Nobody Would Look Under the Hood.

Their apparent security model was based on obscurity. They just assumed no one would poke around. There was no clear indication of encrypting the stored IDs, no system for tokenizing access, no audit logs to see who was looking at this sensitive data. It was the digital equivalent of hiding your house key under the welcome mat.

Worse, they used vague, soothing language in their privacy policy to lull users into a false sense of security. It was all vibes, no substance.

3. Their Architecture Appeared to Be a Disaster Waiting to Happen.

Here’s what seemed to happen: spill appeared to keep “deleted” content, possibly justifying it for potential “law enforcement and cyberbullying investigations.” That sounds responsible, right? But it appeared to be just a convenient excuse to keep everything, forever.

They seemed to have different storage systems for different data—reviews here, IDs over there—all with different (or minimal) security, but all linked by a user ID. It’s like throwing your cash, your diary, and your passport into the same unlocked shed. No data appeared to be treated as more sensitive than any other, which suggests a fundamental misunderstanding of data classification.

If the technical side appeared messy, the legal side looked like a full-blown catastrophe.

First, the defamation risk. spill built a platform that seemed to incentivize libel. They encouraged users to “spill the tea” on people, connecting anonymous (and potentially false) claims to real-world identities without any clear way for the accused to appeal. They didn’t just create a legal minefield; they sold tickets to it.

Then, there’s regulatory compliance. They appeared to be violating multiple state-level privacy laws, like California’s CCPA, which gives users the right to know what data you have and to get it deleted. And if they had users in Europe? That would likely be a spectacular GDPR violation, with fines that could sink a company overnight.

Their Terms of Service? Appeared completely inadequate. It looked like legal theater, not a real contract protecting them or informing their users.

Let’s Be Honest: The Users Got Played, Too.

Okay, we can’t just blame the developers. We need to talk about the users. Thousands of smart, tech-savvy people uploaded their government IDs to a gossip app. Why?

It’s not just a “user problem.” It’s a massive failure of digital literacy.

People saw “verification” and thought it meant “safety.” They didn’t stop to think that they were handing their identity over to a startup with the structural integrity of a sandcastle. The app never clearly said, “Hey, don’t upload your social security card,” so of course, some people did.

This is the TL;DR Tax in action. It’s the price we pay for being too busy, too trusting, or too conditioned to just click “Agree” without reading the fine print. We assume a slick app means a secure backend. Convenience wins, right up until the moment it spectacularly loses.

And Then, Exactly What You’d Expect Happened.

This whole setup appeared to be a honeypot for trolls, and the internet’s worst actors showed up right on schedule.

When the breach happened, it wasn’t quiet. It was weaponized. The leaked data was apparently dumped on various platforms. Bad actors seemed to start mapping IDs to physical locations using the photo metadata. They appeared to build searchable directories of users, cross-referencing everything with social media profiles.

The founders seemed shocked. They shouldn’t have been. If you build a playground for drama and shaming, you can’t be surprised when the bullies take over.

The reported tally? Over 50,000 images leaked. Not just driver’s licenses, but the verification selfies, too. And many of those photos apparently still had the EXIF data attached—GPS coordinates showing exactly where the photo was taken. The breach itself appeared to be amateur hour: what looked like a poorly configured cloud storage bucket with inadequate access restrictions.

So, What’s the Takeaway Here?

If you’re building something, you have a responsibility to not create a dumpster fire.

Ask the Hard Questions First:

Too many teams skip these questions. spill shows us why you can’t.

Nail the Security Basics. It’s Not Optional.

Top 5 Things You Should Never Do (Unless You Want a Lawsuit)

  1. Store sensitive user data “temporarily” — and forget to delete it
  2. Assume Firebase rules are “secure enough” out of the box
  3. Build a liability engine without legal review
  4. Treat PII like throwaway app data
  5. Launch without asking: “How could this be weaponized?”

This isn’t just about being a good engineer; it’s about not ruining people’s lives. Security and legal aren’t costs; they are what separates a real business from a hobby project with a body count.

Building Better, and Being Smarter Users

spill is more than a single failed app. It’s a mirror held up to the tech industry’s worst habits, especially the “vibecoding” trend of letting AI build things without critical human judgment. An AI won’t tell you you’re building a privacy nightmare. That’s our job.

For builders, the lesson is clear: think about the abuse cases. Assume the worst. Build defensively.

And for the rest of us? We have to get smarter. Start looking for the red flags:

If it feels shady, it probably is. Remember, on a free platform, you are the product. Your privacy is just an expense on their balance sheet. And no amount of convenience is worth your ID ending up on the wrong side of the internet.

Recent Posts